Legal Opinion

Petty v. Daimler/Chrysler Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 13, 2002PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid R. Farmer, J.

in which ALAN E. HIGHERS and HOLLY K. LILLARD, J.J., joined.

OPINION

Plaintiff in this case alleges that Defendant violated Tennessee’s motor vehicle glass safety statutes which were in effect when Plaintiff purchased his vehicle in 1998. The court below found no violation and entered judgment for Defendant. We find that Plaintiff failed to introduce evidence of injury or damages and therefore affirm judgment for Defendant. 1

Mr. Petty purchased a new 1998 Plymouth Grand Voyager mini-van in January of 1998. In May of 1998, he filed suit against the manufacturer, DaimlerChrys-ler, 2 in Shelby…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bowden v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Knierim v. LeatherwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Metropolitan Air Research Testing Authority, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. DarnellTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Memphis, Tennessee v. Tre Hargett, Secretary of StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. City of Brentwood v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Wood v. Metropolitan Nashville & Davidson County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API