Farwell v. Jackson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Solano County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Rhodes, J.
This action was commenced against Jackson, Foster and Waterman," in August, 1863. It appears from the complaint that on the 26th of October, 1861, Jackson made and delivered to the plaintiff his promissory note for two hundred dollars, and to secure the payment of the note he assigned to the plaintiff a certain mortgage executed to him by Foster, November 29th, 1858, to secure and indemnify him against any loss that he might sustain in consequence of his having executed a promissory note as surety for Foster to M. A. Wheaton for the payment of five hundred dollars,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by8 opinions
- Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Dooly v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Fullerton v. BaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Lasky v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.