Hennegan v. Geartner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
For reasons to be stated more at length in an opinion to be filed hereafter we conclude that Section 23 of Article 33 of the Code, as enacted by Chapter 934 of the Acts of Assembly of 1945, is valid and constitutional. It is therefore ordered by the Court of Appeals this 12th day of April, 1946, that the order appealed from in the above entitled case be and it is hereby reversed and the petition for mandamus is hereby dismissed with costs.
2Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.
This case is an appeal from an order passed in the Baltimore City Court directing the issuance of a writ of mandamus. The writ commands the Board of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kenneweg v. County Commissioners of Allegany CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Schostag v. CatorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Murphy v. WachterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- State ex rel. Thatcher v. KeithNevada Supreme Court · 1914
4Cited by21 opinions
- Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Shub v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Suessmann v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Lee v. Secretary of State & MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.