Legal Opinion

Schostag v. Cator

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1907No. S.F. No. 4852PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to the Board of Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the defendants to issue instructions to the officers appointed to conduct the approaching primary election in the precinct where petitioner is registered to permit him to vote the ballot of any political party lawfully participating therein, notwithstanding his refusal to comply with the requirements of a new section of the Political Code, known as section 1366a, which provides, among other things, that in all places where the Primary Election Law is in force each elector at the time of registering, or of transferring registration, shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Britton v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API