Legal Opinion

Finley v. Estate of De Grazio

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 17, 2006No. 94,698PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Kelly A. Finley appeals the district court’s dismissal of her medical malpractice suit as untimely filed after her counsel failed to serve process on all defendants within 90 days of filing her petition, even though she effected service within a 30-day extension granted her by a different district judge under K.S.A. 60-203(a)(1). When that extension order was set aside after her 90 days had expired, she argued that the doctrine of unique circumstances should apply to save her service and her lawsuit. We agree, reverse, and remand for further proceedings.

Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Schroeder v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Read v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Hong Van Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. In Re the Appeal of Sumner CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finley v. Estate of DeGrazioSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. Rowland v. BarbCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API