Legal Opinion

LAYZER v. Leavitt

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 7, 2011No. 07 Civ. 11339 (HB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

Hon. HAROLD BAER, Jr., District Judge.

Judith M. Layzer 1 and Ray J. Fischer (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary” or “Defendant”) that denied them reimbursement for certain prescription drugs. The dispute centers on the question of whether the prescription drugs at issue are covered by Medicare Part D, a voluntary prescription drug benefits program. The Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings affirming the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  2. United States ex rel. Brown v. Celgene Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Roeder v. BurwellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  4. Tangney v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  5. Siaci Saint Honore v. Ironbound Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API