Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Beauchamp

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1885No. 11,062PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Vigo Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The only error assigned by the appellant, the plaintiff below, upon the record of this cause, is the sustaining of the defendants’ demurrer, for the want of sufficient facts, to his complaint.

Appellant Rogers alleged in his complaint that during the year 1881 Hon. Harvey H. Scott was the regular judge of the Vigo Circuit Court, of Vigo county, in this State ; that during the vacation of such court preceding its September term, 1881, Judge Scott was sick in Battle Creek, in the State of Michigan, and was thereby unable to return to this State or to hold the September term, 1881, of such court;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Feaster v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. State ex rel. Cropper v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Dowell v. LahrIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Lowery v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Pressley v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API