Legal Opinion

Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1999No. 89,435PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1 KAUGER, J.:

¶ 2 The issues 1 presented are: 1) whether the cause is governed by the law of the case in Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 1994 OK 135, 890 P.2d 866 [Cinco I] holding that federal law did not bar the defense of failure of consideration to the guaranty contract; and 2) whether sufficient evidence of consideration was presented to support an award for antecedent debts under the guaranty agreement. We hold that: 1) under the facts presented, no inequity results in the application of the settled law of Cinco I determining that federal law was not a bar to the defense of failure…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Dolese Bros. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. S.C. v. J.L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API