Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare (In Re Kingsley)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1995No. 19-20699PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

The chapter 7 trustee has brought the above adversary actions seeking an order directing defendants to turn over to him as trustee the non-exempt portion of debtor’s interest in a deferred compensation plan (hereinafter “DCP”). The trustee alleges that the res in question is property of debt- or’s bankruptcy estate that could be utilized to make partial distribution to debtor’s creditors.

Defendants object to the trustee’s request on several grounds. They first deny that debtor’s interest in the DCP is property of the bankruptcy estate.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. International Shoe Co. v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Optimal Payments Ltd. (In Re National Audit Defense Network)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2005
  2. In Re MuellerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  3. Sattin v. Brooks (In Re Brooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  4. In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API