Legal Opinion

Marks v. United States Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 2, 1995No. Civ. A. 4:95cv0050PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION

JACKSON, District Judge.

The matter presented to the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). 1 Plaintiffs, acting pro se, brought this action after the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) affirmed its initial denial of Plaintiff Brenda Marks’ application for disability benefits. Because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action, it GRANTS Defendants’ motion. This disposition of the matter renders it unnecessary to decide Plaintiffs’ Motion for Imposition of Sanctions.

J. FACTS

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Virginia Society for Human Life, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  2. Crawford v. Willow Oaks Country Club, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  3. Marks v. United States Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API