Legal Opinion

Freddy Adan Hurst v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided October 3, 2013No. 10-13-00113-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00113-CR FREDDY ADAN HURST, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 36174CR MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Freddy Adan Hurst, challenges his conviction for tampering with physical evidence, a third-degree felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 37.09(a), (c) (West Supp. 2012). In one issue, Hurst argues that the “trial court erred in permitting the State to introduce computer[-]enhanced images into evidence in violation of the Texas Rules of Evidence.” We affirm. I. BACKGROUND During the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API