Legal Opinion

Pape M. Diedhiou v. The Republic of Senegal et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 22, 2026No. 1:20-cv-05685Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAPE M. DIEDHIOU, Plaintiff, 20 Civ. 5685 (DEH) v. FINDINGS OF FACT THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL et al., AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Defendants. DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: Following a three-day bench trial, Defendants in this matter jointly moved1 under Federal Rule 52(c) for a directed verdict on Plaintiff Pape Diedhiou’s (“Plaintiff” or “Diedhiou”) claims against Defendant Republic of Senegal (“Senegal”) for (1) Breach of Contract; (2) Account Stated; (3) Quantum Meruit; (4) Unjust Enrichment; and (5) Promissory Estoppel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. Leslie Block Kaye v. Marc E. Grossman, Laura Anne GrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Zumpano v. QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API