Legal Opinion

Laurie v. Mueller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1956No. 36,681Published

1Opinion of the Court

248 Minn. 1 (1956)

78 N.W. (2d) 434

CECELIA LAURIE, A MINOR, BY ERLENE LAURIE, HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, AND ANOTHER

v.

RALPH MUELLER AND OTHERS.

HAWS REALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT.

No. 36,681.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 4, 1956.

Freeman, Peterson, Hoppe & Gaughan and Thomas Burke, for appellant.

Durham, Swanson & Lasley, for respondents.

MURPHY, JUSTICE.

The two actions involved in this appeal were originally brought by Cecelia Laurie, a five-year-old minor, through Erlene Laurie, her mother and natural guardian, and by the mother in her own behalf for damages resulting from the alleged…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API