Legal Opinion

Morris v. Knopick

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 2017No. CV-16-373PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Glover, Judge

hThis appeal primarily pertains to the conveyance of a Mateo toolbox and tools.1 The transfer of these items was included as a term of a real-estate contract entered into by buyer Margaret Conti and seller Michael Morris. Although the contract was signed by Conti and Morris, the negotiations were between Morris and Conti’s son, Nickolas Knopick. The litigation commenced with Conti suing Morris, but Kno-pick was eventually substituted for Conti by agreement of the parties. Following a bench trial, the trial court ordered Morris to pay Knopick $92,000 in damages. Both Morris and Knopick appeal.

|…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. City of Caddo Valley v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Cochran v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tasha Renee Wade and Kevin Knight v. Bruce BartleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Dale v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Lone's RT 92, Inc. v. DJ Mart, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. America's Pre-Owned Selection, LLC v. Franchesica WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  5. Charles "chuck" Frankhouse v. City of Russellville, ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API