Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fisher v. Bomar

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

This is a habeas corpus proceedings in which the relator Carl Gene Fisher, a prisoner in the State Penitentiary, seeks his release on the ground that in the trial of his case in Knoxville, upon the charge of a crime against nature, he did not have an attorney to prepare and file a bill of exceptions for him.

The trial court appointed two attorneys to represent him and after conviction, his attorneys made a motion for a new trial which was overruled.

The relator solicited his attorneys to file a bill of exceptions for him. They told him that it would cost approximately $150 to prepare such bill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Lovvorn v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Savage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Fisher v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Vowell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BreslinNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. People v. TeamsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API