Legal Opinion

McCandless v. Krut

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1940No. Appeal, 200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Bhodes, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action in trespass against defendant to recover damages to his milk truck caused by a collision at intersecting streets with defendant’s florist truck. Both motor vehicles were being driven at the time by employees of their respective employers, and in furtherance of the latters’ business. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. The court below granted defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. From the judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff has appealed, and assigns as error the granting of defendant’s motion.

The only question before us…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Jaski v. West Park Daily Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Spear and Company v. AltmyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Gardner v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steingart v. KaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Templin v. HarboldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API