Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 21, 1997No. ARMY 9600168Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM: *

Pursuant to her pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of attempted larceny (three specifications), larceny, and forgery (three specifications) in violation of Articles 80, 121, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 921, and 923 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Contrary to her pleas, she also was convicted of larceny, forgery (thi’ee specifications), and falsely obtaining services (two specifications) in violation of Articles 121, 123, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 921, 923, and 934. The convening…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API