Legal Opinion

Vincent v. PARKLAND LIGHT & POWER CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 4, 1971No. 304-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This appeal raises the question of whether attorney’s fees are properly awarded in an action for common-law indemnity. The parties to this appeal, Parkland Light & Water Co., Inc. and Pacific Lutheran University, Inc., successfully defended a personal injury action brought by plaintiff, Melvin Vincent.

Vincent, an employee of PLU, had claimed injuries from coming in contact with a bare wire connection leading into a building on which he was working. He claimed negli gence of Parkland Light & Water Co., for failing to insulate the wire as required by the state electric code, and PLU for failure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Armstrong Construction Co. v. ThomsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wells v. Aetna InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Fuller v. AngelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haner v. Quincy Farm Chemicals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Manning v. LoidhamerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. North Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. Access Road Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Conrad v. SuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hecomovich v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API