Legal Opinion

In re M.D.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1992No. 91-106PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

In this appeal, appellant V.G., the natural father of a minor child, M.D., appeals from the order of January 17, 1991, denying him visitation. After denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the neglect case, and finding pursuant to the parents’ stipulation that the child was neglected, the trial judge ordered that the conditions of a civil protection order entered June 29, 1990, in a companion intrafamily offense case, would continue to apply for one year, whereby the father would not be allowed any visitation with his child.1 Tr. 19. Appellant contends that the trial judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. S.S. v. D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In re C. W. M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. In re A.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Surrey v. SurreyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Ko. W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In re D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In re L.D.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Wilkins v. FergusonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API