Legal Opinion

Bruce v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1934No. 30995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

All the objections made to the manner of impaneling of the jury have been overruled by the reasoning applied in the cases, Sullivan v. State, 155 Miss. 629, 125 So. 115, and Harris v. State, 155 Miss. 794, 125 So. 253, except perhaps as to the two following complaints made by appellant: (1) That the judge, instead of the sheriff, called some of the talesmen from among those present in the courthouse; and (2) that thereafter the judge directed the sheriff to go to a neighboring village and there procure a sufficient number to complete the jury.

Under the common law, talesmen were always…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. PresleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Trembly v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Wampold v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
  5. Roderick Price v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API