Legal Opinion
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 20, 2008No. 03-1821, 04-1255PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge MOTZ joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a dissenting opinion.
*131OPINION
MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:
We reconsider the constitutionality of a Virginia statute that outlaws what is termed “partial birth infanticide.” Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-71.1 (the Virginia Act or the Act). Reconsideration is required in light of Gonzales v. Carhart (Carhart II), 550 U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 167 L.Ed.2d 480 (2007), which rejected a facial challenge to the federal partial birth abortion statute prohibiting the intact dilation and evacuation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- PBM PRODUCTS, LLC v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Belk, Incorporated v. Meyer Corporation, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Richmond Medical Center for Women v. HerringCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Belk, Incorporated v. Meyer Corporation, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.