Cotton v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
On September 9,1969, a jury found appellant, Seymore Cotton, guilty of burglary and fixed his sentence at five years. He did not appeal. On January 29, 1987, over seventeen years after his conviction, appellant filed a petition for post-conviction relief. A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. He alleged that his conviction should be set aside because of insufficient evidence. The trial court denied the petition on the basis of the three year statute of limitation contained in A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37.2. We affirm the holding.
This Court has repeatedly stated that attacks on the sufficiency of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McCroskey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Pride v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Pitcock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Larry Doby Smittie v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Dept. Of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Cigainero v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Rodney Dale Harmon v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2023
- Chatmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.