Legal Opinion
Chatmon v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided August 3, 2017No. CR-13-1006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2017 Ark. 229
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS. No. CR-13-1006 Opinion Delivered August 3, 2017 ROLANDIS LARENZO CHATMON PETITIONER PRO SE THIRD PETITION AND AMENDED PETITION TO REINVEST V. JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR A STATE OF ARKANSAS WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS AND RESPONDENT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND TO RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE [FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 23CR-12-571] PETITION, AMENDED PETITION, AND MOTION DENIED. JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice Petitioner Rolandis Larenzo Chatmon brings this pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Stanley Ray Hunt II v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019