Cox v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Amended Opinion 1
POHLMAN, Judge:
¶ 1 Petitioner Lavon G. Cox seeks judicial review of the denial of his workers’ compensation claim. We conclude that the Labor Commission did not apply the correct medical causation standard. We therefore set aside the Commission’s order and direct it to reconsider Cox’s claim under the correct legal standard.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In 2013 Cox worked as a maintenance mechanic for Respondent St. George Truss Company. On May 7, 2013, while removing an 80-pound brake drum from a semi truck, Cox “felt a burning, popping sensation” in his back. He “dropped the drum and sunk…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Provo City v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Hutchings v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Virgin v. BD. OF REVIEW OF INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Second Injury Fund v. Streator ChevroletUtah Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yesco v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Morris v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Utah American Energy v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- CR England v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Nielsen v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.