Legal Opinion
Yesco v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided September 10, 2021No. 20200139-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2021 UT App 96
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS YESCO, Petitioner, v. LABOR COMMISSION AND DAVID KELLER, Respondents. Opinion No. 20200139-CA Filed September 10, 2021 Original Proceeding in this Court Bret A. Gardner and Dori K. Petersen, Attorneys for Petitioner Aaron J. Prisbrey, Attorney for Respondent David Keller JUDGE DIANA HAGEN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES GREGORY K. ORME and MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER concurred. HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 For over sixteen years, David Keller worked on a daily basis installing heavy signs using a hammer drill and jackhammer. After undergoing wrist-fusion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Provo City v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. KutlakSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morris v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Jensen Tech Services v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- CR England v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Hoffman v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Hospital Housekeeping Systems v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.