Legal Opinion
Liano v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 28, 1999No. AC 18550PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Carl J. Liano, appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) dated June 3, 1998, affirming a decision of a workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) *77dated March 7, 1997. The defendant, the city of Bridgeport (city), cross appeals from the same decision. The plaintiff claims that the board improperly (1) determined that he was not entitled to have his benefits from 1983 to 1990 adjusted to include overtime and (2) deprived him of property without due process in violation of the federal and state constitutions.1 The defendant claims…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- City of Waterbury v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Burns v. General Motors Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- O'Neil v. Honeywell, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Czujak v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Liano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999