Legal Opinion
Jain v. Kumar
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 18, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02126Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SAMEER JAIN, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 21-2126-EFM RANDEL SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Bifurcate filed by Defendants Roushan Kumar, Anjushree Kumar, Kulture Kurry, and Kansas Kurry. (Doc. 54). Defendants seek an order under which the calculation of any punitive damages would be determined only after the jury determines at trial that Defendants are liable for such damages. Plaintiffs Sameer and Upma Jain oppose the motion. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Easton v. City of BoulderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- American Maplan Corp. v. HeilmayrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Capital Solutions, LLC v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.