Richardson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for delivery of marihuana. Punishment was assessed at five years.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his objection and admitting into evidence a police photograph or “mug shot” of him that was taken on October 22, 1973, or approximately five months before the instant offense was allegedly committed.
Appellant contends the photograph was inadmissible for two reasons. First, the contention that it was not relevant to any issue in the case is without merit. An issue was raised at trial as to the identification of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huerta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Harlan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Araiza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Sweed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.