Legal Opinion

Araiza v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 23, 1996No. 04-94-00697-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNCAN, Justice.

A jury found Albert Araiza guilty of murdering Richard Hernandez and attempting to murder Rene De Los Santos. Araiza now appeals, complaining that the trial court erred in admitting and excluding certain evidence and in limiting his cross-examination of one of the State’s witnesses. We affirm.

Facts

One night in October 1992, while Richard Hernandez and Rene De Los Santos were stopped at the corner of West Woodlawn and Blanco Streets, a passenger in the pickup ahead of them pulled a gun, shot Hernandez, and shot at De Los Santos. Hernandez died as a result of his wounds.

Sh…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Gilstrap v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Alfred Lester Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API