Atchison, T. S. F. B. Co. v. Wooley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by Earl Wooley against the Atchi-son, T. & S. E. R. Co. Judgment for plaintiff, and /defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
The plaintiff, Earl Wooley, brought this action against the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Ee Railroad Company, in the district court of Oklahoma counts'', to recover damages to a certain horse for injuries received on the railroad track of said defendant, from which injuries the said horse died. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed.
For reversal of said judgment, the plaintiff in error assigns as error that the court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant. The position taken by the plaintiff in error is that, under the undisputed facts, there was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Spooner v. D., L. & West. RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Gibson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Foreman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wilson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967