Legal Opinion
Laderbush v. Ethicon, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 4, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00062Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Bonnie Laderbush and George Laderbush v. Civil No. 20-cv-62-JD Opinion No.
2020 DNH 067
Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson O R D E R Defendants Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “Ethicon”) move to exclude the testimony of Dr. Bruce Rosenzweig, M.D., under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc.,
509 U.S. 579
(1993). Doc. 58. The plaintiffs, Bonnie and George Laderbush, object. Standard of Review To testify as an expert, a witness must be qualified to do so “by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.” Fed.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Granfield v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Campos v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.