Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Warren

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 24, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, V. C.

The material facts are as follows: The bill is filed by complainant, a judgment creditor, against Helen E. Warren, a judgment debtor. It prays, in the alternative, that a deed given by her to John E. Knapp- may either be set aside on the ground of fraud or declared to be a mortgage. The complainant has joined as parties other'judgment creditors whose judgments antedate his own. He insists that his lien is superior to these judgments, and also to the mortgage deed, if it shall be deemed such.

The defendants, except Mr. Knapp and Mrs. Warren, are holders of judgments, recovered…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Maginn v. CashinMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re Holly Knitwear, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. PULAWSKI S. & L. ASS'N v. AguiarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  5. Bloom v. Thirty-Six Berwin St. Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API