Legal Opinion

United States v. Emigh

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 9, 1996No. 92-13-CR-FTM-21, 92-123-CR-FTM-21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order

GAGLIARDI, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

The Defendant moves this Court to reduce his sentence in light of a recent amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines which changed the marihuana plant-to-weight ratio for purposes of calculating a defendant’s appropriate guideline range. U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(c) (1995) (as amended by U.S.S.G. amend. 516 (1995)) (“Amendment 516”). The new guideline is retroactive. U.S.S.G. § lBl.lO(e). The Defendant advances two theories as to why his prior sentence should be reduced. First, the Defendant asserts that the new guideline ratio should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. Paul SilversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Jodie Timothy PackerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. EggersdorfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Guy Jerome UrseryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Robert P. Crow DogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Robert Crow DogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API