Legal Opinion
Baker v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 22, 2019No. 1:18-cv-03847Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EARL DONALD BAKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 18-cv-03847 ) v. ) ) Judge Edmond E. Chang SMITH & WESSON CORP., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Earl Baker has sued Smith and Wesson Corp. (S&W), alleging that S&W retaliated against him in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1), and Massachusetts public policy. Baker alleges that he was fired after he reported conduct that he believes was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.