Legal Opinion · Dissent

McGowen v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2018No. 73312Published

1DissentPickering, J.

NRCP 4(c) directs that, "Process shall be served by the sheriff of the county where the defendant is found, or by a deputy, or by any person who is not a party and who is over 18 years of age." (emphasis added). The question presented is what is meant by "party": Does Rule 4(c) 's prohibition against a "party" serving process only apply to the named party plaintiff, or does it extend to a party's representative, here, the lawyer who filed the complaint on the plaintiff's behalf?

Courts elsewhere have divided on this question. See 72 C.J.S. Process § 51 (2018) ; compare, e.g., In re Wills, 126…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. LloydNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API