Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Engineered Plastic Components Inc

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided June 12, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01637Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LAKINA HILL WILKINS, } } Plaintiff, } } v. } Case No.: 2:21-cv-01637-RDP } ENGINEERED PLASTIC } COMPONENTS, INC., } } Defendant. } MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the court on Defendant Engineered Plastic Components Inc.’s (“EPC” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. # 33). Plaintiff Lakina Hill Wilkins has responded to the Motion. (Doc. # 43). Defendant did not file a reply brief. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is due to be granted. I. Relevant Undisputed Facts1 Defendant…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API