Legal Opinion

United States v. Joe Polk

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1986No. 86-1850PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Joe Polk appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. app. § 1202(a)(1) (1982). He argues the Government failed to prove that the gun presented at trial was a firearm within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. app. § 1202(c)(3). We affirm.

At trial the Government introduced into evidence a Smith and Wesson, Model 60.38 caliber revolver. The arresting officer testified that he had removed the gun, which was loaded with five rounds of ammunition, from the defendant. No evidence was introduced concerning the condition of the gun or whether it had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. John Richard LilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Armand W. SamsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Carl Leslie BuggsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Leroy Rush A/K/A James JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Charles HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Mangum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API