Legal Opinion · Dissent

Powell v. Champion Fiber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

AotioN tried before Peebles, J., and a jury, at November Term, 1907, of Bueke. This action was brought by the feme plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged false and wrongful arrest and detention. S. Montgomery Smith and W. H. Reynolds were named as defendants in the summons, but were never served, and the case proceeded to trial as to the Champion Fiber Company. There 'was judgment of nonsuit at the conclusion of the evidence, and plaintiffs appealed.

1DissentClark, C. J.

This action was brought by the feme plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged false and wrongful arrest and detention. S. Montgomery Smith and W. H. Reynolds were named as defendants in the summons, but were never served, and the case proceeded to trial as to the Champion Fiber Company. There was judgment of nonsuit at the conclusion of the evidence, and plaintiffs appealed. The evidence tends to prove that D. A. Powell, the plaintiff's husband, was an employee of defendant company, lived in one of its houses and owed defendant $11 for a stove; that, becoming dissatisfied, he quit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Stewart v. Cary Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Black v. Clark's Greensboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Chambers v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API