Legal Opinion

Platt v. Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1956No. Appeal, No. 102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This was an action in assumpsit commenced by plaintiffs, landlords, to recover $1,680.00 and interest from the defendant, their tenant, for breach of covenant to repair demised premises. The plaintiffs filed a com*482plaint but the defendant filed no answer and the case came to trial before a judge without a jury in the Municipal Court for the County of Philadelphia. At the trial plaintiffs offered in evidence the allegations of their complaint and offered a written point for a finding in their behalf and rested. The defendant objected to the offer on the ground that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Gulf Steamship Co. v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Sookiasian v. Swift Co. Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Fitzpatrick v. BatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Cichocki v. DoroszSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. v. EvertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Platt v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Finkelston v. KapnekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Snyder AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API