Finkelston v. Kapnek
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
This is an action in assumpsit whereby the appellee sought to recover the fair and reasonable charges for labor and material furnished to appellant in the repair of his air conditioning equipment. The answer of appellant admits that the work was done but avers that it was improperly performed and that as a result thereof he was obliged to employ another company to do the same work, with the exception of rewinding two motors, and that he had to pay therefor a sum in excess of that claimed by appellee. The case was tried before the lower court without a jury.
Appellee proved…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fisher v. BrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Cherry v. MitoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Adams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hanick v. LeaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Murphy v. Wolverine Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Townsend v. United States Rubber CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Hughes v. HannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. D'AlonzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- McCann v. Amy Joy Donut ShopsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- McCann v. Amy Joy Donut ShopsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984