Legal Opinion

City of Eugene v. Kokkeler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 1995No. 16-92-08091; CA A81329Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant property owner appeals from the judgment in this condemnation action. We affirm.

The property involved in this case is located in an agricultural zone and is next to the Eugene Airport. The city sought to acquire the property for airport-related uses. However, under the existing zoning, defendant could conduct only agricultural uses on the property. She contends that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence; by instructing the jury that the determination of the value of the property had to be based on its use for agriculture; and by not instructing the jury that it could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State Highway Commission v. OswaltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State Highway Commission v. Carmel Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASH. CTY. v. DuyckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API