Legal Opinion

McQuilken v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Prudential)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Marlene McQuilken (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) terminating Claimant’s compensation benefits. 1 We vacate and remand.

Pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable dated January 22, 1997, Claimant began receiving compensation benefits for an injury described as a “bilateral median nerve entrapment at the wrists left greater than right; bilateral ulnar neuropathy” that occurred on January 12, 1996 while she was working for Prudential (Employer). On June…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Hutter v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Frontini v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D. Colagreco v. WCAB (Vanguard Group Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API