Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
This patent litigation concerns four patents 1 that Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants *509Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (together, “Intellectual Ventures companies” or “IV”) own and claim Defendants/Counterclaimants Capital One Financial Corp., Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and Capital One, N.A. (collectively, “Capital One companies”), are infringing. The Capital One companies admit use but insist that the patents are invalid. Currently pending are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on patent invalidity under…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial CorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015