Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hamm
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
On January 3, 1951, plaintiff, while a pedestrian on a public street in Birmingham, Alabama, was struck and injured, by a motor truck which she alleges was being operated by an agent, servant or employee *260of the defendant, acting within the line and scope of his employment.
Plaintiff’s cause of action is stated in two counts, count 1 charging simple negligence, and count 2 charging wilful and wanton conduct. A demurrer to the complaint, and to each count separately and severally, was overruled and the cause was submitted to the jury on both counts of the complaint and defendant’s…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Venuto v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Terry Dairy Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BARBER PURE MILK COMPANY v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Anderson v. Howard Hall CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Phillips v. J.H. Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Hercules Incorporated v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Phillips v. J.H. Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990