Legal Opinion

Cagle v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1999No. A98A2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Brad and Marty Cagle sued State Farm Fire & Casualty Company to recover for a loss pursuant to an insurance policy. They also asserted a claim under OCGA § 33-4-6 for bad faith refusal to pay the loss. After State Farm paid the policy limits, the trial court granted summary judgment to State Farm on the bad faith claim, and plaintiffs appeal this ruling. Because plaintiffs failed to make a timely demand for payment as required by OCGA § 33-4-6, we affirm.

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Buffalo Insurance v. Star Photo Finishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Howell v. Southern Heritage InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Graham v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bayrock Mortgage Corp. v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Lavoi Corp. v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Arrow Exterminators, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
  4. Byrd v. Regal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Butler v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API