Legal Opinion
Berish v. SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 2011No. Civil Action 3:10-CV-1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Southwestern Energy Production Company’s (“SEPCO”) Motion to Dismiss part of Count I, all of Count IV, and the demand for damages for emotional distress except as to Plaintiff C.S. (Doc. 7.) After the Motion was filed, a Stipulation was filed by the parties pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 dismissing the part of Count I of the Complaint that asserted a claim under 35 P.S. § 6020.1115. (Doc. 18.) The Court signed an Order with regard to this Stipulation on December 9, 2010. Therefore, the Court need only address…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ely v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Roth v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- P.T., a minor, by and through her natural guardians Scott Tennant and Abigail Tennant, G.H., a minor, by and through his natural guardians Glenn Hollabaugh and Trina Hollabaugh, B.K., a minor, by and through her natural guardians Matthew Kennedy and Dia Kennedy, and J.K., a minor, by and through her natural guardians Matthew Kennedy and Dia Kennedy v. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY and EQT XL MIDSTREAM OPERATING LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026