Salzer v. Jocquel Supply (In Re Salzer)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
ROBERT E. GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge.
By its complaint in this proceeding, the plaintiff/debtor, who is proceeding pro se, seeks to recover both compensatory and punitive damages from the defendants Jocquel Supply and Donald Stinson. Although the complaint is in six separate counts, each of which seeks recovery under a slightly different legal theory, in the ultimate analysis plaintiffs claims reduce themselves to the question of whether or not defendants violated the automatic stay. The matter is presently before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Summary judgment is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re AmbotieneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Sticka v. United States (In Re Sturgill)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In re WittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012