Lenoir v. Linville Improvement Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, pending in the Superior Court of Mitchell county, in which a receiver of the defendant corporation was appointed September 1st, 1893. A motion was made by the defendant and heard by his Honor, Judge Timber-lake, at Chambers, in Lenoir, on 3d April, 1895, for the discharge of the receiver.
Read the full summary
Civil action, pending in the Superior Court of Mitchell county, in which a receiver of the defendant corporation was appointed September 1st, 1893. A motion was made by the defendant and heard by his Honor, Judge Timber-lake, at Chambers, in Lenoir, on 3d April, 1895, for the discharge of the receiver. The motion was denied but it was provided in. the order continuing the receiver that any party to the action might renew or make a motion for the discharge of the receiver at Spring Term, 1895, of Mitchell Superior Court. Such motion was made and heard at Chambers, in Burnsville, on 22d May,…
1Opinion of the Court
Furches, J.:
The defendant is a domestic corporation and the plaintiff is a stockholder and creditor of the defendant corporation. Plaintiff, for the reasons alleged in his complaint, commenced this action for the recovery of his debt and for the appointment'of a receiver; and a receiver was appointed on the 23rd of August, 1893, who entered on the discharge of his duties on the 1st of September, 1893. At the time the receiver was appointed, Thomas F. Parker was the president of the defendant corporation, and H. P. Kelsey was secretary, elected at the last annual meeting, in July, 1893, and,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barnes v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lenoir v. Linville Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Milo v. CurtisOhio Court of Appeals · 1994