Sliger v. RH MacY & Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered
2Per curiam
The sole issue before us is whether the general usury statute, N. J. S. A. 31:1-1, applies to the 1^2% per month service or finance charge on revolving charge accounts of defendant, R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., t/a Bamberger’s [Bamberger’s], a retail department store.
The plaintiffs, customers of Bamberger’s, seek to restrain it from charging interest on their revolving charge accounts in excess of the 7 per year then allowed by the statute and an accounting and judgment for all monies “usuriously taken” and payment of the monies into a fund with the Clerk of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Lloyd v. GutgsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Turner v. Aldens, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Rollinger v. JC Penney CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.