Legal Opinion

Sliger v. RH MacY & Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 6, 1971PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered

2Per curiam

The sole issue before us is whether the general usury statute, N. J. S. A. 31:1-1, applies to the 1^2% per month service or finance charge on revolving charge accounts of defendant, R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., t/a Bamberger’s [Bamberger’s], a retail department store.

The plaintiffs, customers of Bamberger’s, seek to restrain it from charging interest on their revolving charge accounts in excess of the 7 per year then allowed by the statute and an accounting and judgment for all monies “usuriously taken” and payment of the monies into a fund with the Clerk of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lloyd v. GutgsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Turner v. Aldens, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Rollinger v. JC Penney CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API