Legal Opinion
Papa v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1988No. Appeal No. 1 ; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff-appellant signed a form denominated "Order for Directory Representation” seeking the placement of advertisements in the New York Telephone Company’s Camillus and Syracuse telephone book yellow pages. The form was not signed by either respondent or its authorized agent for the solicitation of advertisements, respondent Reuben H. Donnelly Corp. Immediately above the area for the applicant’s signature was the notation that, "the applicant hereby requests THE NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY TO…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hamilton Employment Service, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- I. & I. Holding Corp. v. GainsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Petterson v. PattbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- NRP Holdings LLC v. City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Asian Vegetable Research & Development Center v. Institute of International EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Gruet v. Care Free Housing Division of Kenn-Schl Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.